Enigmerra

Chronicle of the solution: The Hour of the Blazon

Disappearance Tier III

The disappearance file has closed. The chronicle below retraces, step by step, how the circle was drawn tight.

The dossier as it reached the desk

Something — or someone — has vanished in Realm of the Crown, and no one can say when the thread was cut. Someone knows more than they say; the silences at court have suddenly grown very loud. Before you, one by one, will stand Ban Radu the Silent, Luca the Squire, Sir Bogdan de Fag, Zaharia the Spice Merchant and Tintar the Jester. Rumor walks the deed through every corner: the salt market, the abbey library, the merchant's house, the mill by the river and the scriptorium. A sharp eye is not enough here — it takes an archivist's patience: fit everything together, then pronounce your verdict.

Suspicion settled on these: Ban Radu the Silent, Luca the Squire, Sir Bogdan de Fag, Zaharia the Spice Merchant and Tintar the Jester. From then on the names mattered less than what could be proved about each.

The suspects

Locations

Objects

Motives

Moments

Everything that could be learned

Nothing is missing from the list and nothing is surplus. Every row below is necessary: without it, the grid would allow several solutions at once.

  1. The bell-ringer remembers well: Luca the Squire came earlier than Zaharia the Spice Merchant.
  2. Sir Bogdan de Fag raises their right hand and says: "I was in the place where anything is bargained for".
  3. The gate guard swears: Zaharia the Spice Merchant was in the place with more secret drawers than drawers.
  4. The gate guard swears: the tallest suspect handled the amber necklace.
  5. The tracks in the dust do not lie: Tintar the Jester was driven by jealousy.
  6. The tracks in the dust do not lie: the suspect with grey hair handled the bishop's chalice.
  7. In the Chancellery's ledger it stands in black and white: the salt market and the ledger of accounts go together.
  8. The Chancellery checked twice: the merchant's house does not match that hour: at vespers.
  9. The hounds caught no scent at all: the hunting crossbow and fear of exposure do not go together.
  10. The Chancellery checked twice: the abbey library and jealousy do not go together.
  11. Tintar the Jester declares under oath: "I handled the silver candelabrum".
  12. The night watch saw the suspect with red hair first, and only then Luca the Squire.
  13. The chancellor deduced it coldly: if the suspect with red hair was there at dawn, then Ban Radu the Silent was driven by greed.
  14. An honest-faced witness saw it plainly: the scriptorium matches that hour: at dusk.
  15. An unsigned note, slipped under the door: "the culprit was driven by revenge".
  16. Even the jester says it in earnest: revenge does not match that hour: at vespers.
Break the seal: the Chancellery's reasoning — open only if you have already tried the dossier

The reasoning, step by step

No suspicion weighed here. Only the grid weighed: every certain match sweeps a whole row and a whole column, and at the end one arrangement alone remains possible.

A note in the margin of the page read: “The bell-ringer remembers well: Luca the Squire came earlier than Zaharia the Spice Merchant”. Every new line in the file closes a door; by the end not one is left open.

The examination of the place yielded this as well: “Sir Bogdan de Fag raises their right hand and says: "I was in the place where anything is bargained for"”. Here the investigation had to judge twice: once the testimony, once the one who gives it.

The archivist underlined the following line with his nail: “The gate guard swears: Zaharia the Spice Merchant was in the place with more secret drawers than drawers”. A certain match thus enters the grid, and its row and column empty at once of every other possibility.

The file thickened quickly, and every fresh page cut something away: “The gate guard swears: the tallest suspect handled the amber necklace”; “The tracks in the dust do not lie: Tintar the Jester was driven by jealousy”; “The tracks in the dust do not lie: the suspect with grey hair handled the bishop's chalice”; “In the Chancellery's ledger it stands in black and white: the salt market and the ledger of accounts go together”; “The Chancellery checked twice: the merchant's house does not match that hour: at vespers”; “The hounds caught no scent at all: the hunting crossbow and fear of exposure do not go together”; “The Chancellery checked twice: the abbey library and jealousy do not go together”; “Tintar the Jester declares under oath: "I handled the silver candelabrum"”; “The night watch saw the suspect with red hair first, and only then Luca the Squire”; “The chancellor deduced it coldly: if the suspect with red hair was there at dawn, then Ban Radu the Silent was driven by greed”; “An honest-faced witness saw it plainly: the scriptorium matches that hour: at dusk”. Taken one at a time they seemed slight; laid together in the grid, they left one arrangement alone possible.

From one word to the next, the investigation arrived here: “An unsigned note, slipped under the door: "the culprit was driven by revenge"”. One attribute of the culprit, no more. Enough, though, to leave on the list only whoever has it.

This too was added to the file: “Even the jester says it in earnest: revenge does not match that hour: at vespers”. The possibility fell without appeal, and the circle tightened by one finger.

The lying testimony

One word was enough. Sir Bogdan de Fag swore before the Chancellery that I was at the salt market — and that alone would not sit with the rest of the file. The truth, drawn out of the other rows, runs thus: Sir Bogdan de Fag never set foot in the salt market. Whoever lies, under the Supreme Law, gives themselves away.

The seal on the file

The Chancellery pronounced its verdict without hesitation: the culprit is Sir Bogdan de Fag. The grid shows plainly how matters stood: Sir Bogdan de Fag was at the scriptorium, handled the amber necklace, was driven by revenge and was there at dusk. Plain elimination was not enough here: every suspect had to be tried as the culprit until all hypotheses but one shattered. Hence the dossier stands at tier III.

Those taken out of the circle

The remaining suspects received their release from the grid too: Ban Radu the Silent was at the abbey library, handled the bishop's chalice, was driven by greed and was there at vespers; Luca the Squire was at the salt market, handled the ledger of accounts, was driven by fear of exposure and was there after matins; Zaharia the Spice Merchant was at the merchant's house, handled the hunting crossbow, was driven by blackmail and was there at noon; Tintar the Jester was at the mill by the river, handled the silver candelabrum, was driven by jealousy and was there at dawn. Every one of these rows was necessary: take out a single one and the verdict can no longer be demonstrated.

Whoever reads this chronicle years from now will find in it less a deed than a method.

Play this dossier All mysteries

Everything you read above rests on the dossier itself. The Chancellery's solver checked, at publication, that the given clues yield exactly one solution — no more, and not none. behind the scenes at the Chancellery.