Enigmerra

Chronicle of the solution: The Mystery of the Night

Disappearance Tier III

What had been made invisible was found, and whoever hid it answers for it today. Here is the road there.

The dossier as it reached the desk

Something — or someone — has vanished in Realm of the Crown, and no one can say when the thread was cut. Someone knows more than they say; the silences at court have suddenly grown very loud. Suspicion has fallen on Luca the Squire, Filip the Steward, Princess Smaranda, Petru the Herald and Ilinca the Baker — and until the proof is plain, none of these names leaves the room. The testimonies cling to certain hours: "at dawn", "after matins", "at noon", "at dusk" and "at vespers". A sharp eye is not enough here — it takes an archivist's patience: fit everything together, then pronounce your verdict.

The names entered in the file were Luca the Squire, Filip the Steward, Princess Smaranda, Petru the Herald and Ilinca the Baker. The investigation regarded them all with the same coldness, as is proper.

The suspects

Locations

Objects

Motives

Moments

The testimonies on file

Here is the whole file, as the investigator received it. Not one row is spare — it was checked by removing each in turn and watching the unique solution disappear.

  1. Filip the Steward declares under oath: "I was there at dawn".
  2. In the Chancellery's ledger it stands in black and white: Ilinca the Baker was at the mill by the river.
  3. Even the jester says it in earnest: the mill by the river and the inheritance do not go together.
  4. In the Chancellery's ledger it stands in black and white: the throne room and the ledger of accounts go together.
  5. The Chancellery checked twice: Filip the Steward never touched the ruby dagger.
  6. The healer says it with a raised finger: if the suspect with grey eyes handled the amber necklace, then Princess Smaranda was driven by jealousy.
  7. In the gate ledger, Filip the Steward stands higher, Luca the Squire lower.
  8. Whatever the market gossips: Luca the Squire never touched the ruby dagger.
  9. The tracks in the dust do not lie: greed matches that hour: at dawn.
  10. The night watch saw Luca the Squire first, and only then Ilinca the Baker.
  11. The traces left at the scene show it plainly: the culprit handled the signet ring.
  12. An honest-faced witness saw it plainly: the ledger of accounts and a debt of honour go together.
  13. An honest-faced witness saw it plainly: the ledger of accounts matches that hour: at vespers.
  14. The gate guard swears: the cathedral crypt matches that hour: at noon.
  15. The gate guard swears: the castle cellar and the locked chest go together.
  16. The Chancellery checked twice: the ruby dagger does not match that hour: at dusk.
  17. The hounds caught no scent at all: the locked chest and greed do not go together.
Reveal the Chancellery's reasoning — open only if you have already tried the dossier

The road to the verdict

No suspicion weighed here. Only the grid weighed: every certain match sweeps a whole row and a whole column, and at the end one arrangement alone remains possible.

A report from the watch brought clarity: “Filip the Steward declares under oath: "I was there at dawn"”. The testimony was set aside on the scales: if the speaker is innocent it is true; if not, it is precisely the reverse.

The next line was the one that changed the reckoning: “In the Chancellery's ledger it stands in black and white: Ilinca the Baker was at the mill by the river”. A certain match thus enters the grid, and its row and column empty at once of every other possibility.

There followed a detail that narrowed the circle: “Even the jester says it in earnest: the mill by the river and the inheritance do not go together”. The possibility fell without appeal, and the circle tightened by one finger.

Then came, one after another, the findings that drew the noose tight: “In the Chancellery's ledger it stands in black and white: the throne room and the ledger of accounts go together”; “The Chancellery checked twice: Filip the Steward never touched the ruby dagger”; “The healer says it with a raised finger: if the suspect with grey eyes handled the amber necklace, then Princess Smaranda was driven by jealousy”; “In the gate ledger, Filip the Steward stands higher, Luca the Squire lower”; “Whatever the market gossips: Luca the Squire never touched the ruby dagger”; “The tracks in the dust do not lie: greed matches that hour: at dawn”; “The night watch saw Luca the Squire first, and only then Ilinca the Baker”; “The traces left at the scene show it plainly: the culprit handled the signet ring”; “An honest-faced witness saw it plainly: the ledger of accounts and a debt of honour go together”; “An honest-faced witness saw it plainly: the ledger of accounts matches that hour: at vespers”; “The gate guard swears: the cathedral crypt matches that hour: at noon”; “The gate guard swears: the castle cellar and the locked chest go together”. Each cut a strip out of the grid, and at the end of them the space remaining was the size of a name.

The archivist underlined the following line with his nail: “The Chancellery checked twice: the ruby dagger does not match that hour: at dusk”. One possibility fewer means, in the grid, one step nearer the only answer left.

The examination of the place yielded this as well: “The hounds caught no scent at all: the locked chest and greed do not go together”. One more door closed. Investigations are not won on suspicions but on doors closed one at a time.

The lie

Not a single lie was heard in this dossier. The single testimony on file withstood checking. Since a lie is, under the Supreme Law, the culprit's signature, its absence among those who spoke cleared them one by one, leaving the guilt with the one who chose to stay silent.

The culprit's name

At the end of the grid one name alone remained: Ilinca the Baker. At the hour in question, Ilinca the Baker was at the mill by the river, handled the signet ring, was driven by blackmail and was there at dusk. The dossier called for hypotheses driven to contradiction, not direct elimination alone — which is why it was rated at tier III.

What became of the others

And here is what had become of the others, in that same hour: Luca the Squire was at the castle cellar, handled the locked chest, was driven by the inheritance and was there after matins; Filip the Steward was at the merchant's house, handled the amber necklace, was driven by greed and was there at dawn; Princess Smaranda was at the cathedral crypt, handled the ruby dagger, was driven by jealousy and was there at noon; Petru the Herald was at the throne room, handled the ledger of accounts, was driven by a debt of honour and was there at vespers. Not one of the rows above is spare — remove it and the grid opens again.

Whoever reads this chronicle years from now will find in it less a deed than a method.

Play this dossier All mysteries

The chronicle is written from the logic of the file, not from memory. The uniqueness of the solution was demonstrated by the solver before the dossier ever became public. behind the scenes at the Chancellery.