Enigmerra

Chronicle of the solution: The Enigma of the Citadel

Forged decree Tier III

The file on the forged decree is closed; what remains is the reasoning, which deserves keeping rather more than the deed.

How the file came to the Chancellery

A parchment full of orders no one ever gave is circulating through Realm of the Crown, and the harm has only begun. The forgery is skilled: only an eye trained on the archives found its flaw. On the Chancellery's list stand Chamberlain Iorgu, Castellan Ursu, Zaharia the Spice Merchant, Onufrie the Executioner and Ilinca the Baker; one of these names covers a lie. The hours in question: "at dawn", "after matins", "at noon", "at dusk" and "at vespers". The threads were tangled on purpose: investigate, weigh every word, and pronounce your verdict only when the grid leaves no room for doubt.

The names entered in the file were Chamberlain Iorgu, Castellan Ursu, Zaharia the Spice Merchant, Onufrie the Executioner and Ilinca the Baker. The investigation regarded them all with the same coldness, as is proper.

The suspects

Locations

Objects

Motives

Moments

The pages of the file

The list below is complete and pared to the bone. The Chancellery keeps no useless rows on file: each cuts something no other cuts.

  1. A maid whispered it at confession: the castle cellar and the ledger of accounts go together.
  2. In the gate ledger, Onufrie the Executioner stands higher, the suspect with grey eyes lower.
  3. Ilinca the Baker declares under oath: "I was driven by greed".
  4. The gate guard swears: the silver-clad icon matches that hour: at dawn.
  5. The Chancellery checked twice: the Golden Boar inn and blackmail do not go together.
  6. An honest-faced witness saw it plainly: revenge matches that hour: after matins.
  7. An honest-faced witness saw it plainly: the silver-clad icon and blackmail go together.
  8. The gate guard swears: Ilinca the Baker was in the place where the cells only seem abandoned.
  9. The chronicler notes drily: the abbey library matches that hour: at dusk, whatever the court may say.
  10. By the order of the hours, first comes Castellan Ursu, then the suspect with brown eyes.
  11. The tracks in the dust do not lie: the bishop's chalice matches that hour: at vespers.
  12. An honest-faced witness saw it plainly: a debt of honour matches that hour: at vespers.
  13. The gate guard swears: the suspect with brown eyes handled the amber necklace.
  14. An honest-faced witness saw it plainly: Zaharia the Spice Merchant handled the silver-clad icon.
  15. Every scout reports the same about the culprit: the culprit was driven by a debt of honour.
See how the verdict was reached — warning: past this line, the mystery ends

The road to the verdict

The road is always the same: findings first, because they do not lie; testimonies after, because one of them always does.

A detail overlooked at the start came back into the file: “A maid whispered it at confession: the castle cellar and the ledger of accounts go together”. The cell filled, and around it a space opened: that is what a certain match does to a grid.

It was set down, for whoever reads after us: “In the gate ledger, Onufrie the Executioner stands higher, the suspect with grey eyes lower”. One more link was drawn into the chain that would close at the verdict.

There followed a detail that narrowed the circle: “Ilinca the Baker declares under oath: "I was driven by greed"”. The testimony entered the file with a reservation attached: true if the speaker is innocent, false otherwise.

The file thickened quickly, and every fresh page cut something away: “The gate guard swears: the silver-clad icon matches that hour: at dawn”; “The Chancellery checked twice: the Golden Boar inn and blackmail do not go together”; “An honest-faced witness saw it plainly: revenge matches that hour: after matins”; “An honest-faced witness saw it plainly: the silver-clad icon and blackmail go together”; “The gate guard swears: Ilinca the Baker was in the place where the cells only seem abandoned”; “The chronicler notes drily: the abbey library matches that hour: at dusk, whatever the court may say”; “By the order of the hours, first comes Castellan Ursu, then the suspect with brown eyes”; “The tracks in the dust do not lie: the bishop's chalice matches that hour: at vespers”; “An honest-faced witness saw it plainly: a debt of honour matches that hour: at vespers”; “The gate guard swears: the suspect with brown eyes handled the amber necklace”. Taken one at a time they seemed slight; laid together in the grid, they left one arrangement alone possible.

The examination of the place yielded this as well: “An honest-faced witness saw it plainly: Zaharia the Spice Merchant handled the silver-clad icon”. A certain match thus enters the grid, and its row and column empty at once of every other possibility.

A note in the margin of the page read: “Every scout reports the same about the culprit: the culprit was driven by a debt of honour”. This line spoke of the guilty party without pointing a finger — and for that very reason it was useful.

The lying testimony

Not a single lie was heard in this dossier. The single testimony on file withstood checking. Since a lie is, under the Supreme Law, the culprit's signature, its absence among those who spoke cleared them one by one, leaving the guilt with the one who chose to stay silent.

The verdict

The Chancellery closed the dossier with a single name written on it: Chamberlain Iorgu. The arrangement in the grid is this: Chamberlain Iorgu was at the Golden Boar inn, handled the bishop's chalice, was driven by a debt of honour and was there at vespers. Plain elimination was not enough here: every suspect had to be tried as the culprit until all hypotheses but one shattered. Hence the dossier stands at tier III.

Those taken out of the circle

The grid took them out of the circle one by one, place in the story and all: Castellan Ursu was at the castle cellar, handled the ledger of accounts, was driven by revenge and was there after matins; Zaharia the Spice Merchant was at the watchtower, handled the silver-clad icon, was driven by blackmail and was there at dawn; Onufrie the Executioner was at the abbey library, handled the map of the realm, was driven by the inheritance and was there at dusk; Ilinca the Baker was at the old dungeon, handled the amber necklace, was driven by greed and was there at noon. Not one of the rows above is spare — remove it and the grid opens again.

The page closes. What is left of the whole affair is a truth that can be demonstrated, and that is worth more than a confession.

Play this dossier All mysteries

Nothing in this chronicle is invented: the text rises out of the dossier's logic, and the dossier passed through the solver before publication, so that its solution is provably unique. behind the scenes at the Chancellery.